requestId:68499aabb3b148.67236310.
Liu Mengxi: Returning to the “Six Rivers” and inheriting the energy value that has never been worn out in ancient times
Accessor: Zeng Fantian
Accessor: Liu Mengxi
Source: “Master of Confucianism”
Time: Confucius was in the 2568th year of Dingyou April 21st Guimao
Jesus May 16, 2017

Liu Mengxi, the chief teacher of Liu Mengxi, Yu Dongshu Book House
Liu Mengxi, a literary and historical student, is from Huang County, Shandong Province, and was born in Gongning in 1941. He is currently a finalist of the Chinese Art Research Institute, director of the Chinese Civilization Research Institute, and a member of the Center’s Literature and History Research Center, and the founder and editor of the “Chinese Civilization” magazine. The purpose of the discussion is to think about the history of civilization, the literary thoughts of the Ming and Qing dynasties and modern academic thoughts, and as a doctoral supervisor of the purpose of the history of Chinese civilization and academic thinking. Important works include: “Traditional Misread” (1996), “Academic Thoughts and Characters” (2004), “Red Building Dreams and a Century of China” (2005), “A Brief Introduction to Modern Chinese Academics” (2008), “On the National Studies” (2008), “National Studies and Red Studies” (2011), “The Madman’s Energy of Chinese Civilization” ( 2012), “Chen Baozhen and the New Deal in Hunan” (2012), “Chen Yinke’s Stories” (2014), “Traditional and Modern Times of Contemporary China (2014), “Ma Yifu and National Studies” (2015), “The Contemporary Contemporary Students” (2015), “The True Love of the Red Chamber Dream” (2016), etc.
At the end of the winter of the year of Bingshen, the author was fortunate to visit Liu Mengxi Teachers and Teacher Liu Mengxi to ask Liu Zhuanxi Teachers and learn about his education and academic purposes. It can be seen in words and speeches. Teacher Liu teaches the management and writing of books and is also due to his personality. His mind has both the interests of literati and the will of scholars. In recent years, Master Liu has focused on the value theory of the “Six Sessions”. He advocated: inherit these unscrupulous energy values and form a modern civilizational self-conception to restore the true goodness of people.
【Note】
Zeng Fantian: At the end of the 1980s and early 1990s of the 20th century, you were in charge of compiling the “Chinese Modern Academic Classic”. This set of books totaled more than 25 million words, and spent 44 Chinese modern scholars. I hope that Master Liu and his teachers would discuss the relevant situations in this regard.
Liu Mengxi:The “Chinese Modern Academic Classics” this set of books took me six or seven years. Now that I am overjoyed, I am not able to discuss my past jobs because I am not able to do so. My gain is that I have the opportunity to system-connect the first-class humanists in the 20th century and have a better understanding of the knowledge of modern Chinese science. Although the case I focused on is Wang Guowei, Chen Yinke, Ma Yifu, and Money Dragon books, I have written research articles from many other scholars, including discussions and general discussions. And my case discussions were conducted under the perspective of modern Chinese academic research in the 20th century, and the vision was relatively comprehensive.
The history of Chinese academic thinking has long been. As early as the Zhou and Qin dynasties, their own academic thinking has emerged on a large scale. Later, after passing through pre-Qin Zixue, two-Han period, Wei Xuan, Sui and Tang Buddhist, Song and Ming dynasties, Qing dynasties, late refreshing and refreshing academic thinking, etc., all stages have aspirational academic thinking. Liang Qichao wrote an article “Study and Art”, and he wrote: “Study means to observe things and discover their true ideas; art means to take the truth and seek to use them.” Learning reminds the causal relationship of the object, and is based on knowledge and invents in theory; art is the specific use of perceptual knowledge, as well as the way and method of pursuing perceptual knowledge.
A civilized nation and an era of civilizational atmosphere reflect both social customs and academic thinking, and the two influence each other. At the end of the 20th century, the master focused on one question, which was what changes would occur in the 21st century and how these changes would apply. I think looking back at the 20th century China from the perspective of academic history will help us think and act now. Because the deep thinking of the academic elites of the era of 有报本六 is often hiding information beyond the times.

The “A Brief Introduction to Modern Chinese Academics” talks from left to right: Liang Zhiping, Lei Xian, Li Shenzhi, Dai Yi, Tang Yijie, Li Zehou, and Yu Dunkang, with his back as Chief Teacher Liu Mengxi.
ZengShizutian: Later, after the proposal of Teacher Li Zehou, the seminar on Modern Academic Thoughts in China was held in a special seminar. Famous scholars such as Dai Yi, Luo Pu, Tom Yijie, Li Zehou, Li Shenzhi, Yu Dunkang should be invited to participate. Can you please ask Teacher Liu to review the scene at that time?
Liu Mengxi:That discussion was important to discuss one of my articles, “A Brief Introduction to Modern Chinese Academics”. This article was finally the preface written by me for “Classics of Modern Chinese Academics”. Later, “Chinese Readings” was published in two rounds in four full pages, which caused a big reaction in the academic world. At the end of 1996, Li Zehou returned from Hainei. After reading this article, he believed that he had raised many major questions about thinking history and academic history, so he proposed to find some companions to discuss it. So I held that meeting at my house.
The teachers who opened that meeting were all prepared to come and the debate was very hot. We talked from 3 o’clock in the next war book to 6 o’clock in the morning, and continued during dinner. Even if there is tea or food, you cannot say that the reception is not good, but if these people gather together, you must not say that they are just talking good things. As the author of the article, I am also willing to hear various disagreement discussions.
At that time, Xiao Pu said, “You have a basic problem when writing a master, you look up. Ma Yifu is an immortal, that’s not. Not only Ma Yifu, you look upwards all people. You have to stand on the shoulders of future generations and have this spirit. This is a big problem.” Yu Dunkang said, “After half a century, I have It is good to accept classics from the modern times. From 1897 to 1997, we spent too much time in the 100 years. Speaking of looking up, not looking down—the worst thing we have taught is that as long as looking down, not looking up. You are like looking up and talking down. What qualifications do you have to look down? “The atmosphere was a bit tight at that time. Fortunately, Li Shen’s interjection said that he neither “looks up” nor “looks down”, but “looks down”. The master couldn’t help but laugh!

Liu Mengxi Teacher Chief Teacher Receives Interview
《Chinese Modern Academics<a The set of books in the collection of books, which are written by each volume, are all experienced figures in the academic world, such as Yu Jiaxi and Yang Shuda, with teachers Li Xueqin, and Dong ZuoBaobao.com comparisonBen Books, including Teacher Qiu Xigui, who are two major experts in ancient Chinese characters. The editor of Kang Youyi is Zhu Wei, and the editor of the Public Rights Books is Wang Rongzu. Zhang Taiyan Books are Chen Pingyuan, Liang Qichao Books are Xia Xiaohong, and they are also young masters. In 1992, I went to Harvard Major to attend the academic seminar. When Yu Ying was invited to visit Princeton School, he also proposed the selection of this set of books. Advocate. Teacher Zhang Shunhui, Teacher Song Yi, and other teachers all expressed specific opinions to me. It took me a long time later that I learned that Teacher Ji Lin had asked his assistant to read the full text word for him in the four editions of the article published in the “Chinese Reading Books”, which made me feel very ashamed. By editing this set of books, I am more familiar with the most representative works of modern Chinese scholars.
Zeng Fantian: What is the most basic difference between it and “traditional science”?
Liu Mengxi: The connotation of modern science is independent of s
發佈留言